需要金币:500 个金币 | 资料包括:完整论文 | ||
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 | 论文字数:见简介 | ||
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 | 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc) |
译文(字数 3360) 题目:探索企业经营能力,盈利能力和发展能力之间的关系 摘要:通过对30家上市家电企业的数据集进行聚类分析和规范相关方法,探讨企业经营能力,盈利能力和发展能力之间的关系。 研究表明,企业的盈利能力和发展能力受经营能力的影响,资产周转应集中。 此外,企业盈利能力与发展能力的关系不明显。 换句话说,不仅应该关注盈利能力,而且要考虑企业的发展能力。 关键词:聚类分析•规范相关性•开发能力•企业竞争力•经营能力•盈利能力 介绍:企业竞争力是指在竞争性市场中,企业可以提供比其他企业更有效的产品或服务,并实现盈利和自我发展的能力。如何有效地评价企业竞争力,许多学者作了积极探索。 Chen和Chen认为企业竞争力的评价具有模糊性,采用模糊综合评价(FCE)进行定量评价,构建指标体系。 Liu and Zong应用数据包络分析(DEA)来研究企业竞争力。 Yin和Zhang通过提取共同因素消除多重共线性并使用因子分数模型进行综合评价,从而将因素分析纳入企业竞争力评价中。应用分析层次过程(AHP)来评估企业核心竞争力的指标体系。考虑到指标之间的相关性,郭先生使用分析网络过程(ANP)建立了企业软功率评估模型。 Zhang通过分析外部环境和业务流程来调查企业能力和竞争力之间的动态关系。 Sun采用PCA-PINMAP计算指标权重,并通过TOPSIS方法建立了企业竞争力评价模型。根据上述文献的研究,我们发现许多学者专注于综合评价研究,但是,很少有研究集中在研究企业竞争力内部互动的不同组成部分。本文尝试使用聚类分析和规范相关方法来解决这个问题。
外文原文(字符数 14161) Exploring the Relationship Among the Enterprise Operation Ability, Profitability and Development Ability Tong Liu and Ya-juan Han Abstract The paper explores the relationships among enterprise operation ability, profitability and development ability by applying cluster analysis and canonical correlation methods which are performed on a dataset of 30 listed household electrical appliance enterprises. The study shows that enterprise profitability and development ability are affected by operation ability, and assets turnover should be focused. Besides, the relationship between enterprise profitability and development ability is not apparent. In other words, not only profitability should be focused, but also do think about the enterprise development ability. Keywords Cluster analysis • Canonical correlation • Development ability • Enter-prise competitiveness • Operation ability • Profitability
Introduction
The enterprise competitiveness is such ability that in a competitive market, an enterprise can provide more effective products or services than other companies and make profitability and self-development (Porter 1985; Zhang et al. 2003). How to evaluate the enterprise competitiveness effectively, many scholars made positive explorations. Chen and Chen believed that the evaluation of the enterprise compet-itiveness had a fuzzy character, and adopted fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) to make a quantitative evaluation and construct an index system (Chen and Zhang 1999; Chen 2005). Liu and Zong applied the data envelopment analysis (DEA) to study the enterprise competitiveness (Liu 2001; Zong et al. 2002). Yin and Zhang brought the factor analysis into the evaluation of the enterprise competitiveness by extracting common factors to eliminate multicollinearity and using the model of factor scores to make a comprehensive evaluation (Yin and Liu 2004; Zhang et al. 2006). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to evaluate the index system of enterprise core competitiveness by Yin et al. (2007). Considering the correlation between indexes, Guo used the analytic network process (ANP) to set up an enterprise soft power evaluation model (Guo and Liang 2008). Zhang investigated the dynamic relationship between the enterprise ability and competitiveness by analyzing the external environment and business processes (Zhang et al. 2011). Sun adopted PCA-PINMAP to calculate the index weights, and set up an enterprise competitiveness evaluation model by using TOPSIS method (Sun et al. 2011). According to the study of the above literatures, we find that many scholars focused on a comprehensive evaluation research, however, few researches focused on the study of the different components of the internal interaction about the enterprise competitiveness. The paper attempts to use cluster analysis and canonical correla-tion methods to solve this problem. |