摘要:武侠文学进入大陆新武侠的文类转型期，“智性”武侠的概念进入了武侠研究视野。智性，它表现的是一个人处于持续发展下的心智历程，是一种不断受到外界刺激，以个体在其内在精神的独立引导下发展起来的个人智慧。本文以方白羽“千门大传”系列武侠小说为主要研究对象，通过对其创作背景中蕴含的文化部分的分析，揭示对武侠小说进行智性研究的创作意义、现实意义以及文化意义。在千门系列中，智性写作表现到人物形象中的特点，分为三个方面，一是主角在情节中的表现；二是复仇对主角的影响；三是主角的佛性光环。而武侠文化的智性表现及特点方面，一是个人哲思、群体哲思对文学内涵的客观要求；二是江湖世界对侠客文化的道德反思；三是具备武侠历史的“反武侠”特征；四是传承了传统武侠的优良品质，同时又是大陆新武侠创作向多元化转型的必经过程。

关键词：武侠小说 智性 千门系列

ABSTRACT:In the martial arts literature entering the mainland new martial arts genre transformation period, concept of "intellectual" martial arts into view martial arts research. Intelligence, it is a person in the mental process of sustainable development, is a constant stimuli, with individual independence in its inner spirit under the guidance to develop personal wisdom. In this paper Fang Baiyu "thousand doors." series of novels as the main object of study, through the analysis of the cultural part contains the creation background, studied intelligence on the chivalric novels creation significance, practical significance and cultural significance. In the thousands of door series, features of intellectual writing performance to the characters, divided into three aspects, one is thousand door series plot power; two is the impact of revenge on the hero; three is the halo Buddha lead characters. Martial arts culture and intellectual performance and characteristics, one is the personal philosophy, philosophy is an objective requirement of the group of literary connotation; two is the world of moral reflection of chivalrous culture; three is a martial arts history "anti-swordsman" feature; four is the heritage of the traditional martial arts of excellent quality, but also is a necessary process of transition of China mainland the new martial arts creation to diversified.

Key Words: Martial arts novels；Intellectual wise；Thousand Doors series

　　　本文试图从历史性、哲思性、人本性、文学性等方面对对武侠小说的智性进行研究探讨，尽管从深度和广度上讲，仅仅言及主题之万一，在方式方法和科学布局上也存在缺陷，然而，这也让我从某种角度看到了现代武侠小说创作的局限性——作者创作能力的不同而局限了武侠小说在类型化创作的大趋势下读者所接收到的阅读差异，它呈现出良莠不齐的特点，而值得一提的是，这也是武侠小说创作的特性之一。事实上，本文对武侠小说的智性进行分析，确定它在武侠文学中的历史定位、文学定位、审美定位并不是最终目的，我是希望通过这样一种方式，从批判反思当中，获得对智性的启示。当然，这并不是说我们就一定要生搬硬套，犯与本文相同的错误。我想，作出对智性研究的参考性建议，也就是本文的最大价值所在了。