双及物构式中的压制机制研究_英语论文.doc

资料分类:英语论文 上传会员:梦溪 更新时间:2017-10-11
需要金币1000 个金币 资料包括:完整论文 下载论文
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 论文字数:11936
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)

Abstract:In analyzing the meaning of idioms, Chomsky’s TG theory runs into trouble because its explanation of meaning from deep structure can not work. Thus, based on the analysis of idioms, Cognitive Linguistics gradually comes into being. Along with its maturity, there appears a new method of studying syntax, saying, Construction Grammar. When Construction Grammar comes into being, it has largely challenged the position of TG School. In analyzing all aspects of language, Construction Grammar acts as a much more economical and terse approach compared with previously dominant Transformational-generative grammar. Besides, it conforms to the human’s cognitive style of language. Specifically, when it comes to the interaction between construction and verb, Construction Coercion plays an important role and has been widely used when conflicts between construction and verb emerge. It is due to its efficiency that many researchers have put their most, if not all, attention on construction. However, it seems that these researchers are moving to another extreme, that is to say, they nearly ignore the meaning of verbs. It is quite sure that a construct consists of words, and these words also have their own meanings. Thus, under certain circumstances, some words could inflict effects on construction, and this approach is called Lexicon Coercion, in which case the meaning of words takes precedence over that of construction. Based on Construction Coercion and Lexicon Coercion, Integrative Coercion is put forward. In particular, ditransitive construction is targeted and analyzed to prove that Integrative Coercion is a better tool to explain specific language cases owing to its embodiment, mutual-compensation, and polysemy.

 

Key words: Cognitive Linguistics; Construction; Ditransitive Construction; Construction Coercion; Lexicon Coercion

 

Contents

Abstract

摘要

1 Introduction-5

2 literature review-7

2.1 Cognitive Linguistics-7

2.2 Construction Grammar-7

2.3 Construction Coercion-9

2.4 Lexicon Coercion-11

2.5 Summary-13

3 Theoretical Basis: Integrative Coercion-14

3.1 Motivation of Integrative Coercion-15

3.2 Characteristics of Integrative Coercion-15

3.2.1 Embodiment-15

3.2.2 Mutual-compensation-16

3.2.3 Polysemy-17

3.3 Mechanism of Integrative Coercion-18

3.4 Summary-19

4 Integrative Coercion in Ditransitive Construction-20

4.1 Introduction of Ditransitive Construction-20

4.2 Prototypical meaning of ditransitive construction-20

4.3 Lexicon Coercion in ditransitive construction-22

4.3.1 Motivation of Lexicon Coercion-22

4.3.2 Classification of ditransitive verbs-23

4.4 Integrative Coercion in ditransitive construction-24

4.4.1 Verbs of Group A-25

4.4.2 Verbs of Group B-25

4.4.3 Verbs of Group C-26

4.4.4 Verbs of Group D-27

4.4.5 Verbs of Group E-27

4.4.6 Verbs of Group F-28

4.4.7 Verbs of “Reverse Transfer”-29

4.5 Summary-30

5 Conclusions-31

References-32

Acknowledgment-33

相关论文资料:
最新评论
上传会员 梦溪 对本文的描述:大部分研究者在探讨构式时把重点放在了构式压制上,一味的去研究构式对词汇所产生的影响,追求构式压制这一单向压制。但这好像又走向了另一个极端,即抛弃词汇义只谈构式义。......
发表评论 (我们特别支持正能量传递,您的参与就是我们最好的动力)
注册会员后发表精彩评论奖励积分,积分可以换金币,用于下载需要金币的原创资料。
您的昵称: 验证码: