需要金币:1000 个金币 | 资料包括:完整论文 | ||
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 | 论文字数:6126 | ||
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 | 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc) |
ABSTRACT
Over the past fifty years, Grice’s cooperative principle has been severing as a golden rule in people’s interactions. While due to diplomatic needs on many occasions, such as complexity and sensitivity, confidentiality, violation of Cooperative Principle does occur, especially on the regular press conferences of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This thesis discusses the violations of cooperative principle based on the data collected from the regular press conferences of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Study shows that most non-cooperative cases violate the maxim of quantity, then followed by violations of maxim of relevance, and the violations of maxim of manner are the least. A research on the combination of the cooperative principles with diplomatic discourse can not only enable us to gain more insight into the volatile international affairs, but also offer us a clear picture of China’s independent foreign policy. Meanwhile, it is also conducive in providing advice and reference to all levels of government to create a sound diplomatic language theory. Key words: Diplomatic Activities Diplomatic Language Cooperative Principle Violations of Cooperative Principle
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ABSTRACT 中文摘要 Chapter One Introduction-1 1.1 Research Background-1 1.2 Purpose and Significance-1 1.3 Structure of the Thesis-2 Chapter Two Literature Review-3 2.1 The Development of Chinese Diplomatic Language-3 2.2 Study about the Phenomenon of Vagueness, Redundancy, Euphemism Counterfactual in Diplomatic Language-3 2.3 Explanation of Language Phenomenon (Vagueness, Redundancy, Counterfactual, Euphemism) from the Perspective of Leech’s Politeness Principle-4 2.4-Grice’s Cooperative Principle-5 Chapter Three Data Collection and Analysis-7 3.1 Data Collection-7 3.2 Data Analysis-7 Chapter Four Analysis and Discussion-9 4.1 Analysis of typical cases-9 4.1.1 Violations of maxim of Quantity-9 4.1.2 Violations of maxim of Quality-11 4.1.3 Violations of maxim of Relevance-11 4.2.4 Violations of maxim of Manner-13 Chapter Five Conclusion-15 5.1 Major Findings-15 5.2 Limitations-15 BIBLIOGRAPHY-17 APPENDIX-18 |