摘要：反致制度的产生与发展问题由来已久，关于其优劣与否的争论也持续不断。承认与接受反致的国家包括奥地利、英国等，也有拒绝接受的国家，如希腊、秘鲁。由于进入相对的平缓期，人们对于反致的关注与创新在近年来没有太多的增加，只是在学界的态度上从曾经的“敬而远之”，到逐渐地主张在某些领域例外使用。我国在长期的立法以及司法实践中对于反致并没有明确的接受态度，有时反而是拒绝的姿态。反致制度其实有着独特的价值，看似可有可无，但是值得接驳运用。本文希望通过理论性的分析，精简出该制度特有的优势，并借鉴他国的成功案例，明确反致在中国的可行性，尝试将它与实际相结合，提出符合中国特色的反致运用体系。

关键词：反致  利弊争议  价值分析  逐步承认  接轨

Abstract：The issue of Renvoi has a long history and the debate on whether it is good or not has also sparked on the legal field. Such countries as Austria and UK admit and accept this system, while there are some against it, for example, Greece and Peru.  After entering a period which only tiny changes took place in this field, people didn’t pay more attention or give more innovation on this subject than before. A small alternation is that they began to apply this system rather than ignore it like they had used to do. The legal system of our country has not shown clearly the attitude of acknowledging it. Instead, it appears to deny Renvoi. But this system has a great deal of distinguished values which seem not so necessary to nowadays particles. On the other hand, however, we could learn from it and make a good use of it. Rnvoi has undisputable advantages which requires our reviews and cautions.First and foremost, we should analyze the possibility of its existing and use in our country so that we can lay a foundation for later development. Together with sucessful cases in other countries, this essay wants to come up with the idea that Renvoi could work well with the legel system of our coutry.

Key Words: Renvoi,  pros and cons,  analysis of the values,  gradual acknowledgement,  transition