教师书面性纠正反馈对学生写作语法错误修改的影响.doc

资料分类:英语论文 上传会员:佩佩教授 更新时间:2017-09-08
需要金币1000 个金币 资料包括:完整论文 下载论文
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 论文字数:5547
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)

Abstract

 

The feedback of ESL teachers in students’ writing has been claimed to be abstract, vague, and variable from teacher to teacher. Therefore, this research investigates the effect of four corrective feedback methods on the correction of grammar error in English writing: underline method, codes method, clues methods, and self-correction method. In this experimental study, the subjects are 36 science freshmen university students. To examine how explicit error feedback should be and the differences between different feedback methods in improving accuracy of compositions, the researcher introduced three dimensions as measurements: error ratio, identification ratio, and correction ratio. The results show that all four feedback methods help to identify and correct errors in students’ composition, of which clues methods is the most effective one. However, these four feedback methods have slight influence on improving the accuracy of students’ composition. And there is no evidence showing which feedback method is most effective in improving the accuracy of student composition. The researcher attributes this result to the scale of this study and the fossilization of subjects’ English proficiency. Lastly, the researcher offers some advice for practical use.

 

Keywords: written corrective feedback, explicitness of feedback, grammar correction, second language writing

 

Contents

Abstract

摘  要

1. Introduction-1

2. Theoretical basis-2

2.1 The definition of corrective feedback-2

2.2-The problems that Chinese ESL teachers meet towards corrective feedback-2

2.3-The discussions on the effectiveness of corrective feedback-2

2.4-The explicitness of feedback-3

2.4.1 Researches on the explicitness of feedback-3

2.4.2 The definition of the explicitness of feedback-4

2.4.3 The measurement of the effects of feedback-4

3. Method-5

3.1 Subjects-5

3.2-Design and procedures-5

3.3-Statistical analysis-7

4. Results-8

4.1 The analysis of the initial composition-8

4.2 The analysis on efficacy of four feedback methods-8

4.3 The analysis on whether four feedback methods help to accuracy in students composition-10

5. Conclusion and limitations-12

6. Implications for practice-14

References-15

相关论文资料:
最新评论
上传会员 佩佩教授 对本文的描述:In this case, this paper will further investigate the effect of teacher’s corrective feedback on the correction of grammar error in English writing from three dimensions, that is, error ratio, identification ratio, and correction ratio.......
发表评论 (我们特别支持正能量传递,您的参与就是我们最好的动力)
注册会员后发表精彩评论奖励积分,积分可以换金币,用于下载需要金币的原创资料。
您的昵称: 验证码: