奥巴马与布什9.11演讲的架构分析_英语论文.docx

资料分类:英语论文 上传会员:佩佩教授 更新时间:2017-09-08
需要金币1000 个金币 资料包括:完整论文 下载论文
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 论文字数:6691
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)

Abstract

 

This paper is to analyze the political discourses on the basis of the frame theory about 911 attack, which were delivered respectively by the incumbent ---Barack Obama, a Democrat and his predecessor ----George Bush, a Republican. It is illustrated that frames within these two texts bear a close relation to the political decisions made by liberals and conservatives, as well as the values upheld by them. Frames from two opposing camps feature partisan inclinations: the frames that fall into the category of Democratic party lines foreground “empathy”, responsibility, service to the public, cooperation and unity, while those belong to Republican camp are associated with power, authority, order, justice, national security and the business enhancement. The contrastive study of the frames and the scenes contained in these public statements is to fully reveal the partisan worldviews respectively held by liberals and conservatives, and is to further explore the differences between two categories of political arguments. 

 

Keywords: 911 attack; Democrat; Republican; frame; scene; authority

 

Contents

Abstract

摘  要

1.Introduction1

2.Prerequisite knowledge of Frame and Partisan Family Models3

2.1 The Notion of Frame and Frame Semantics3

2.2 Democratic and Republican Worldviews3

3.Framing and Reframing within Partisan Values5

3.1 Frames Proposed by Bush’s Speech 5

3.1.1 The Scene of  War5  

3.1.2 The Frame of  Mass Murder7

3.1.3 The Frame of Governmental Power 8

 3.2 Frames Constructed by Obama’s Speech 8

3.2.1 The Frame of  One8  

3.2.2 The Frame of Keeper9

4.Contrast across Frames Proposed by Liberals and Conservatives10

4.1 Authority Versus the Public10

4.2 Anger and Hope11

5.Conclusion12

Notes13

References14

相关论文资料:
最新评论
上传会员 佩佩教授 对本文的描述:This paper justifies itself with the flourishing of the discipline of cognitive linguistics itself. And here comes a quotation on cognitive science from George Lakoff and Mark Johnson as to provide a prerequisite knowledge:......
发表评论 (我们特别支持正能量传递,您的参与就是我们最好的动力)
注册会员后发表精彩评论奖励积分,积分可以换金币,用于下载需要金币的原创资料。
您的昵称: 验证码: