作为论辩话语的新闻-《纽约时报》中美光伏贸易摩擦报道语用论辩.doc

资料分类:英语论文 上传会员:白鲸 更新时间:2017-11-03
需要金币1000 个金币 资料包括:完整论文 下载论文
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 论文字数:7998
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)

ABSTRACT

 

Many scholars have treated news as a specific discourse to study at home and abroad. However, seldom do they pay attention to the argumentative characteristics of news discourse. Based on the pragma-dialectical model of argumentation theory and the framework of analyzing argumentative discourse, this paper makes an analysis of the report on China-US trade war on solar products in the New York Times. It aims to reveal the real position and argumentative strategies used by the New York Times behind its seemingly neutral attitude.

This paper found that the report is not as objective and neutral as it is supposed to be. In the report, the author violates the rules for critical discussion and applies faulty argument schemes to defend his own standpoint, aiming at persuading the readers that the United States government should impose import and dumpling tariffs on Chinese solar products.

Key words: News Discourse; Argumentation; Pragma-dialectical Model of Argumentation

 

CONTENTS

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ABSTRACT

摘要

Chapter One INTRODUCTION-1

1.1 Research Background-1

1.2 Aim and Significance-1

1.3 Organization of the Thesis-2

Chapter Two LITERATURE REVIEW-3

2.1 Definition of News Discourse-3

2.2 Overseas Studies on News Discourse-3

2.3 Domestic Studies on News Discourse-4

2.4 Summary-5

Chapter Three RESEARCH DESIGN-6

3.1Theoretical Assumptions-6

3.1.1News as discourse-6

3.1.2 News as argumentative discourse-6

3.2 Data to Be Analyzed-7

3.3 Research Questions-7

3.4 Research Methods-7

Chapter Four CONTEXT ANALYSIS-10

4.1 China-US Trade War on Solar Products-10

4.2 The New York Times-10

Chapter Five RESULTS AND DISCUSSION-11

5.1 Reconstructional Analysis of the Report-11

5.2 Argumentative Unsoundness of the Report-12

5.2.1 Violations of the ten rules in the New York Times-13

5.2.1.1 Violation of the unexpressed premise rule-13

5.2.1.2 Violation of the standpoint rule-14

5.2.1.3 Violation of the argument scheme rule-15

5.3 Summary-19

Chapter Six CONCLUSION-20

6.1 Conclusion-20

6.2 Limitations-21

6.3 Future Research-21

REFERENCES-22

相关论文资料:
最新评论
上传会员 白鲸 对本文的描述:研究发现,《纽约时报》对于中美光伏贸易争端报道并非客观和公正。报道的作者违背了相关的批判性讨论准则。此外,该作者还使用了错误的论证图示来论证自己的观点,企图说服读......
发表评论 (我们特别支持正能量传递,您的参与就是我们最好的动力)
注册会员后发表精彩评论奖励积分,积分可以换金币,用于下载需要金币的原创资料。
您的昵称: 验证码: