中国外交部新闻发布会发言人应答话语中的实用论证型研究.docx

资料分类:英语论文 上传会员:白鲸 更新时间:2017-11-04
需要金币1000 个金币 资料包括:完整论文,开题报告 下载论文
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 论文字数:8200
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)

ABSTRACT

 

The press conferences of China’s foreign ministry play a crucial role in posting diplomatic message and expressing China’s internal and external policies and standpoints of vital matters concerned. There is no doubt that as the mouthpiece of China’s foreign ministry, the spokespersons bear a more important function of persuading others to accept these policies and standpoints naturally in a reasonable and effective way. Studies on the spokespersons’ replies contribute a better defense of national standpoints and rational image and a better enhancement of international credibility. And due to its characteristics of practicality and argumentation, pragmatic argumentation is widely used in the spokespersons’ replies.

Current studies on the spokespersons’ replies at the foreign ministry’s press conferences mainly focus on the perspective of politics, communication, linguistics or pragmatics while their argumentative character is always ignored. This research aims to identify and analyze the use of pragmatic argumentation in China’s foreign ministry spokespersons’ replies based on the basic argument scheme of it. Furthermore, the complex pragmatic argumentation would be classified into three main categories on the basis of three argument schemes. They are pragmatic argumentation based on a symptomatic relation, pragmatic argumentation based on analogy and pragmatic argumentation based on causality.Furthermore, different critical questions in the pragma-dialectical theory would be asked to evaluate the three types of pragmatic argumentation applied in specific cases to help defend the standpoint better.

 

Key words: China’s foreign ministry spokespersons’ reply; Pragmatic argumentation; Argument scheme; Critical question

 

CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ABSTRACT

摘要

Chapter OneINTRODUCTION-1

1.1 Research Background-1

1.2 Aim and Significance-2

1.3 Organization of the Thesis-2

Chapter TwoLITERATURE REVIEW-4

2.1 Studies on China’s foreign ministry spokespersons’ replies at the press conferences-4

2.2 Studies on Pragmatic Argumentation-5

2.3 Summary-6

Chapter ThreeRESEARCH DESIGN-7

3.1 Theoretical Assumptions-7

3.1.1 China’s foreign ministry spokespersons’ replies as argumentative discourse-7

3.1.2 General Argument Scheme of Pragmatic argumentation-8

3.1.3 Different Types of Argumentation Based on the Argument Scheme-9

3.1.4 Pragmatic Argumentation Supplemented by the Three Different Types of Argumentation-10

3.2 Research Questions-10

3.3 Data Collections-11

Chapter FourRESULTS AND DISCUSSION-12

4.1 Pragmatic Argumentation Based on a Symptomatic Relation-12

4.1.1 The Identification and Analysis of pragmatic argumentation based on a symptomatic relation-12

4.1.2 Evaluation of pragmatic argumentation based on a symptomatic relation-14

4.2 Pragmatic Argumentation Based on Analogy-16

4.2.1 The Identification and Analysis of pragmatic argumentation based on analogy-16

4.2.2 Evaluation of pragmatic argumentation based on analogy-17

4.3 Pragmatic Argumentation Based on Causality-18

4.3.1 The Identification and Analysis of pragmatic argumentation based on causality-18

4.3.2 Evaluation of pragmatic argumentation based on causality-21

Chapter FiveCONCLUSIONS-23

5.1 Major Findings-23

5.2 Implication-24

5.3 Limitations-24

5.4 Future Research-24

REFERENCES-25

相关论文资料:
最新评论
上传会员 白鲸 对本文的描述:找出其中出现的典型实用型论证、并将其分类,评判这种实用型论证对其立场观点的支持程度以及更重要的是,针对外交部新闻发布会,我们应该如何运用这种实用型论证。有效地支持......
发表评论 (我们特别支持正能量传递,您的参与就是我们最好的动力)
注册会员后发表精彩评论奖励积分,积分可以换金币,用于下载需要金币的原创资料。
您的昵称: 验证码: