Truscott 与 Bruton书面语法纠错反馈之辩_英语论文.doc

资料分类:英语论文 上传会员:白鲸 更新时间:2017-11-03
需要金币1000 个金币 资料包括:完整论文 下载论文
转换比率:金额 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币 论文字数:7022
折扣与优惠:团购最低可5折优惠 - 了解详情 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)

ABSTRACT

 

The effectiveness of grammar error correction in L2 writing class (or written corrective feedback) has been the subject of much controversy in recent years. On the one side, Truscott holds the view that grammar error correction is ineffective and should be abandoned. On the other side, scholars such as Ferris, Chandler, Ellis and Bruton argue that grammar error correction has benefits and should be maintained. Among all the debates, the one between Truscott and Bruton is very unique in that it has brought up many important questions regarding theoretical underpinnings, research design, ecological validity and logic reasoning, which were simply ignored in the other debates. Yet despite its importance, it has been given little attention. This paper discusses the process and the focus of the Truscott-Bruton debate, reflects upon their disagreements and potential common ground, thus providing implications for future research design and actual teaching practice.

Key words: Truscott; Bruton; L2 writing; error correction;

 

CONTENTS

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ABSTRACT

摘要

Chapter One INTRODUCTION-1

Chapter Two AN OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEBATE-2

Chapter Three FIRST FOCUS OF THE DEBATE

3.1 An Overview of Truscott’s Idea-3

3.2 Points of Departure-4

3.3 Bruton’s View of Process-Communicative Writing-5

3.4 Theoretical Divergence and Common Ground-8

Chapter Four SECOND FOCUS OF THE DEBATE-9

4.1 The Issue of Variability-10

4.2 The Issue of Ecological Validity-14

Chapter Five CONCLUSION-17

REFERENCES-19

相关论文资料:
最新评论
上传会员 白鲸 对本文的描述:Truscott和Bruton之争最为独特,因为它提出了许多重要的问题,如理论基础、实验设计、生态效度、论证逻辑等,而这些在之前的研究和辩论中都被忽视。虽然这场辩论很重要,但它却没有......
发表评论 (我们特别支持正能量传递,您的参与就是我们最好的动力)
注册会员后发表精彩评论奖励积分,积分可以换金币,用于下载需要金币的原创资料。
您的昵称: 验证码: